Featured Posts

GENERAL ADVICE WARNING: The information on Countinghouse’s website and other documentation contains general information and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is important, before deciding whether to take or use Countinghouse services or products (or, if you are already a Countinghouse customer, to continue your use) that you consider all the Countinghouse documentation (including our Risk Warning) having regard to your own situation. Countinghouse is not a financial advisor and all services are only provided for professional investors or wholesale investors. Please consider our Risk Disclosure Statement and legal documentation and ensure that you fully understand the risks involved in light of your personal circumstances before you decide whether to acquire our services. We encourage you to seek independent advice if necessary.

Risk-balancing in a mutual fund

February 3, 2017


Perhaps the most tangible and noticeable impact of a high-risk, high return product can be seen when it is included in the portfolio of a mutual fund. Mutual funds can be an integral component of long-term investing, especially when considering self-managed superannuation. One doesn’t need to allocate much of the mutual fund’s overall mix to an active, high-yield product such as Countinghouse’s algorithmic trading system in order to see a significant increase in returns over time. Figure One uses data from the case study below to visually represent just how small a percentage of the mutual fund needs to be with an active, high-return investment while still making a considerable overall difference in profitability.


 Figure One: Shows the relatively small allocation of a mutual fund's pool to an active, high-return product. This small allocation has a comparatively big impact on increased profitability. 


In our case study today, we look at a mutual fund manager with a pool of 2.9 million, making twelve percent per annum on average. We then contrast this approach with a more risk-balanced strategy, taking 200 thousand of that pooled fund and investing in an active, high-yield investment product, moving 40% of the profit back into passive investments at the 12 month mark (Table One and Figure Two). If you’ve read the previous blogs, you will recognise this as a typical de-risking drawdown and money management example we provide, acknowledging the importance of treating active investments with the appropriate methodology.


 Table One: Standard/passive mutual fund as compared with risk-balanced portfolio including active, high-return product.


 Figure Two: Increased profitability from the risk-balanced portfolio over time.


The mutual fund would see increased profitability, and the mutual fund manager would yield a more substantial yearly bonus income (based on 10 percent profit paid as commission). Table Two and Figure Three show this hypothetical difference in bonus income for the mutual fund manager.


 Table Two: Higher commission for a mutual fund manager over time


 Figure Three: Showing increased commission for a mutual fund manager overseeing a blended-risk portfolio. 


Countinghouse believes that balancing risk in investment portfolios delivers substantial returns when handled correctly with regards to money management and drawdown strategies. If a professional investor is unused to integrating active, high-yield products into their mix, joining a mutual fund that does deal with this investment type could be a potential solution.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter